Publication:
Applying a reflexive framework to evaluate a communication skills curriculum

dc.contributor.authorCheung L.
dc.date.accessioned2021-04-05T03:24:48Z
dc.date.available2021-04-05T03:24:48Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.date.issuedBE2559
dc.description.abstractAfter creating and delivering an educational curriculum, medical educators must ultimately evaluate the effectiveness of the implemented curriculum. Seasoned educators can benefit from using an established framework to help them structure a thorough, complete cur-ricular evaluation; however, novice educators may have difficulty in transforming the concept of evaluation into a concrete process. The RUFDATA (Reasons and purpose, Uses, Focus, Data and evidence, Audience, Timing, and Agency) framework is one such paradigm. It is a well-recognized tool consisting of a reflexive framework that can guide medical educators to evaluate their own medical education curriculum. Just as important, it enables medical educators to reflect on the reasons behind the evaluation. This insight, in turn, can foster a spirit of evaluation, thus helping to ingrain it into the local educational culture. By using the evaluation of our communication skills curriculum as an example, this article describes how educators can apply the RUFDATA framework to evaluate their own curriculum. © 2016 Cheung.
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.identifier.citationAdvances in Medical Education and Practice. Vol 7, No. (2016), p.587-592
dc.identifier.doi10.2147/AMEP.S115789
dc.identifier.issn11797258
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-85098149333
dc.identifier.urihttps://swu-dspace2.eval.plus/handle/123456789/5975
dc.rights.holderScopus
dc.titleApplying a reflexive framework to evaluate a communication skills curriculum
dc.typeArticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
swu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85098149333&doi=10.2147%2fAMEP.S115789&partnerID=40&md5=5019e54e0badb70e8957783d9e125fb4

Files